B2 or not B2? That is the question: a review of periprosthetic fractures around cemented taper-slip femoral components

نویسندگان

چکیده

Aims Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around cemented taper-slip femoral prostheses often result in a component that is loose at the prosthesis-cement interface, but where cement-bone interface remains well-fixed and bone stock good. We aim to understand how best classify manage these by using modification of Vancouver classification. Methods reviewed 87 PPFs. Each was first episode fracture component, surgical management consisted revision surgery. Data regarding initial injury, intraoperative findings, were prospectively collected. Patient records serial radiographs determine classification, whether cement well fixed (B2W) or (B2L), time union following treatment. Results In total, 47 B2W (54.0%) one B3 (1.1%) had remained interface. These cases treated with cement-in-cement (CinC) arthroplasty. Overall, 43 follow-up united, two patients sustained further secondary nonunion required A total 19 B2L (21.8%) managed arthroplasty either uncemented components, proximal One case could not be classified. Conclusion endorse original system include subclassification B2 (where bone) loose). Fractures design stems are more likely pattern compared composite beam which pattern. can reliably CinC revision. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):71–78.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Periprosthetic fractures around loose femoral components.

The development of periprosthetic fractures around loose femoral components can be a devastating event for patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA). As indications for THA expand in an aging population and to use in younger patients, these fractures are increasing in incidence. This review covers the epidemiology, risk factors, prevention, and clinical management of periprosthet...

متن کامل

A systematic review of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

AIMS The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of Vancouver type B2 and B3 fractures by performing a systematic review of the methods of surgical treatment which have been reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. For inclusion, studies required a minimum of ten patients with a ...

متن کامل

The use of uncemented extensively porous-coated femoral components in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

We assessed the outcome of patients with Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures treated with femoral revision using an uncemented extensively porous-coated implant. A retrospective clinical and radiographic assessment of 22 patients with a mean follow-up of 33.7 months was performed. The mean time from the index procedure to fracture was 10.8 years. There were 17 patients with a sati...

متن کامل

Impaction femoral allografting and cemented revision for periprosthetic femoral fractures.

We reviewed retrospectively the outcome of the treatment by impaction grafting of periprosthetic femoral fractures around loose stems in 106 patients with Vancouver type-B2 and type-B3 fractures. Eighty-nine patients had a cemented revision with impaction grafting and a long or short stem. The remaining 17 had cemented revision without impaction grafting. Fractures treated by impaction grafting...

متن کامل

Periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with a modular distally cemented stem.

PURPOSE To assess the treatment outcome of revision hip arthroplasty for Vancouver type B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures using a modular distally cemented stem. METHODS 22 men and 14 women (37 hips) aged 66 to 79 (mean, 70) years underwent revision hip arthroplasty for Vancouver type B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. The indication for surgery was periprosthetic fracture with stem loose...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: The bone & joint journal

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2049-4408', '2049-4394']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.103b1.bjj-2020-0163.r1